Second-Order Governance

RCC

RCC governs changes to WRS and execution-related rules. It is a side governance function, not a normal linear execution step.

This page explains the public architecture role, relationships, and boundary. It does not disclose implementation mechanisms, interfaces, credentials, or rule packages.

Position

Side governance over rules

RCC should be understood as governing changes to WRS and execution-related rules, rather than as a module that simply receives Agent output.

What it governs

Who, why, authorization, records, eligibility effects

RCC governs who can change rules, why a change is allowed, how authorization is recorded, how the change is traced, and whether it affects execution eligibility.

Core role

Protect the rule layer from casual change

Without RCC, a system might appear rule-governed while allowing the rules themselves to be weakened, bypassed, or silently rewritten.

Not responsible for

Not ordinary action approval

RCC does not approve every proposed action. It governs the conditions under which rule changes themselves are legitimate.

Relationship

RCC governs WRS changes

The clean public relationship is: RCC governs changes to WRS and execution-related rules.