Side governance over rules
RCC should be understood as governing changes to WRS and execution-related rules, rather than as a module that simply receives Agent output.
Second-Order Governance
RCC governs changes to WRS and execution-related rules. It is a side governance function, not a normal linear execution step.
This page explains the public architecture role, relationships, and boundary. It does not disclose implementation mechanisms, interfaces, credentials, or rule packages.
RCC should be understood as governing changes to WRS and execution-related rules, rather than as a module that simply receives Agent output.
RCC governs who can change rules, why a change is allowed, how authorization is recorded, how the change is traced, and whether it affects execution eligibility.
Without RCC, a system might appear rule-governed while allowing the rules themselves to be weakened, bypassed, or silently rewritten.
RCC does not approve every proposed action. It governs the conditions under which rule changes themselves are legitimate.
The clean public relationship is: RCC governs changes to WRS and execution-related rules.