Proposed action and relevant facts
LERA-J receives the action proposal after the Judgment Root Node, together with available context, facts, uncertainty, and consequence information.
Judgment Function
LERA-J forms structured judgment over a proposed action and the facts surrounding it before governance decisions are made.
This page explains the public architecture role, relationships, and boundary. It does not disclose implementation mechanisms, interfaces, credentials, or rule packages.
LERA-J receives the action proposal after the Judgment Root Node, together with available context, facts, uncertainty, and consequence information.
Its downstream path is LERA-G, where judgment is connected to authority, responsibility, and execution eligibility.
Public output categories include judgment facts, risk and irreversibility, alternatives, uncertainty, and whether judgment is sufficient to continue.
LERA-J does not grant final execution permission. It forms judgment; LERA-G governs whether and how the action may continue.
It prevents a plausible AI proposal from being treated as good enough for execution merely because it is coherent or efficient.